git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

http://git-scm.com/docs/git-rebase is (partially) not well formatted

From
JCJoel Costigliola <joel.costigliola@gmail.com>
Date
May 14, 2012, 11:44 UTC
Message-ID
<CAC0j=P0ggu4XuL==7mku08D3z7coQQbxsy2sfB-0EFO7k9SESQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,

I just wanted to point out that the rebase reference doc page http://git-scm.com/docs/git-rebase is partially unreadable. It is ok and nice until phrase : "This is useful if F and G were flawed in some way, or should not be part of topicA. Note that the argument to --onto and the <upstream> parameter can be any valid commit-ish."

Then the formatting is improper, no more paragraph or special formatting for command.

Regards,
Joel
Next: Carlos Martín Nieto
Message 1 of 2 in “http://git-scm.com/docs/git-rebase is (partially) not well formatted”
  1. Joel CostigliolaMay 14, 2012
  2. Carlos Martín NietoMay 14, 2012

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.