Re: [PATCH 0/7] New sequencer workflow!
- From
Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 15, 2011, 15:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABURp0qt+r09Uy_nfLd60pXiMMXgTOUB__XL-N=S7HaJa-oWoA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1321181181-23923-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com>
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> $ git revert moo..baz > ... conflict ... > $ echo "resolved" >problematicfile > $ git add problematicfile > $ git sequencer --continue > > In other words, it just doesn't matter how you started what sequencing > operation: you can always continue a it with "git sequencer > --continue" and reset it with "git sequencer --reset".
I see that --reset was added to cherry-pick, revert and sequencer around the same time back in August. Shouldn't it be spelled "--abort" instead?
This would align better with other commands that do the same thing (am, merge, notes-merge, rebase) since they all appear to spell it "--abort". Also, it will make it easier in git 2.x when we begin using "git continue" and "git abort" rather than "git reset".
Phil