Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] merge-tree: add a new --dry-run flag
- From
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 13, 2025, 15:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABPp-BHp7RXHFy18=fr1dqQgKiO3PNjXQkL2VX-cjSGsHp48aw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqa57giqyi.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 6:24 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> > "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > > > From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > > > Git Forges may be interested in whether two branches can be merged while > > not being interested in what the resulting merge tree is nor which files > > conflicted. For such cases, add a new --dry-run flag which > > will make use of the new mergeability_only flag added to merge-ort in > > the previous commit. This option allows the merge machinery to, in the > > The first three lines are almost identical to [1/2] here, modulo the > internal name still being mergeability-only while the external name > is now dry-run, which is perfectly fine as long as that is done > consistently. > > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-merge-tree.adoc b/Documentation/git-merge-tree.adoc > > index cf0578f9b5e8..7dcc17806191 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/git-merge-tree.adoc > > +++ b/Documentation/git-merge-tree.adoc > > @@ -65,6 +65,12 @@ OPTIONS > > default is to include these messages if there are merge > > conflicts, and to omit them otherwise. > > > > +--mergeability-only:: > > But is this internal or external name?
external; Kristoffer caught this oversight too. I'll send a re-roll with this fixed. (I apparently also missed it in the die-if-incompatible-options too, not sure how I missed all of these, but I'll ensure they're all fixed up).