Re: [PATCH 0/2] Submodule merging: i18n, verbosity
- From
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 11, 2018, 00:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABPp-BFPaOxokRoiVnAB+KRMt6=NihmjRH+exS_NbGMbdj+k4Q@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180510211917.138518-1-sbeller@google.com>
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Leif wrote: >> Sure, let me know what to use instead and I’ll update and resubmit the patch. >> Sure, but `MERGE_WARNING` prefixes all the messages with "Failed to >> merge submodule“. > > I thought about replying and coming up with good reasons, but I wrote some > patches instead. > > They can also be found at https://github.com/stefanbeller/git/tree/submodule_i18n_verbose > > I think these would be a good foundation for your patch as well, as you can use the > output() function for the desired cases. > > Feel free to take these patches as part of your series or adapt > (or be inspired by) as needed.
This is awesome. In addition to the good reasons you gave, switching merge_submodule() to use output() was one of several things on my todo list since I think it'd be needed for remerge-diffs (https://bugs.chromium.org/p/git/issues/detail?id=12) and might be useful for merges in bare repos; thanks for tackling it.
Patches look good to me. Having Leif's patch on top of these two would be great.
Elijah