Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Declare merge-ort ready for general usage
- From
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 19, 2021, 23:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABPp-BEFPCmr-_cn5bzoOefMN4LKARefKaoobcgJLjcRLBBoZg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <80cccc70-296a-05d2-94a8-0e005e4abe1d@gmail.com>
One more thing...
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:09 AM Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/17/2021 5:27 PM, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
^^^ Note: 18 hours, 42 minutes difference.
Show 19 quoted lines
> > This series depends on ort-perf-batch-10[1], and obsoletes the ort-remainder > > topic[2] (that hadn't been picked up yet, so hopefully this doesn't cause > > any confusion) > > > > With this series, merge-ort is ready for general usage -- it passes all > > tests, passes dozens of tests that don't under merge-recursive, and > > merge-ort is is already significantly faster than merge-recursive when > > rename detection is involved. Users can select merge-ort by (a) passing > > -sort to either git merge or git rebase, or (b) by setting pull.twohead=ort > > [3], or (c) by setting GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM=ort. > > > > Changes since v1: > > > > * subsumed the ort-remainder topic (the first 10 patches), which has > > already been reviewed by both Ævar and Stolee[2]. > > * the next two patches were the original v1, reviewed by Stolee > > * the final patch is new and adds testing. > > Sorry for the delay in looking at this.
Delay?!? You only took a day and a half to respond! That's a fast turnaround, not a delay. Don't apologize for that, or you'll set unreasonably high expectations that'll scare the rest of us away. :-)
Thanks for all your review efforts; it's very much appreciated!