Show 51 quoted lines
>
> Fix two different but related memory leaks in
> verify_clean_subdirectory(). We leaked both the "pathbuf" if
> read_directory() returned non-zero, and we never cleaned up our own
> "struct dir_struct" either.
>
> * "pathbuf": When the read_directory() call followed by the
> free(pathbuf) was added in c81935348be (Fix switching to a branch
> with D/F when current branch has file D., 2007-03-15) we didn't
> bother to free() before we called die().
>
> But when this code was later libified in 203a2fe1170 (Allow callers
> of unpack_trees() to handle failure, 2008-02-07) we started to leak
> as we returned data to the caller. This fixes that memory leak,
> which can be observed under SANITIZE=leak with e.g. the
> "t1001-read-tree-m-2way.sh" test.
>
> * "struct dir_struct": We've leaked the dir_struct ever since this
> code was added back in c81935348be.
>
> When that commit was written there wasn't an equivalent of
> dir_clear(). Since it was added in 270be816049 (dir.c: provide
> clear_directory() for reclaiming dir_struct memory, 2013-01-06)
> we've omitted freeing the memory allocated here.
>
> This memory leak could also be observed under SANITIZE=leak and the
> "t1001-read-tree-m-2way.sh" test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
> ---
> unpack-trees.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
> index bea598c9ece..260e7ec5bb4 100644
> --- a/unpack-trees.c
> +++ b/unpack-trees.c
> @@ -2138,9 +2138,10 @@ static int verify_clean_subdirectory(const struct cache_entry *ce,
>
> d.exclude_per_dir = o->dir.exclude_per_dir;
> i = read_directory(&d, o->src_index, pathbuf, namelen+1, NULL);
> + dir_clear(&d);
> + free(pathbuf);
> if (i)
> return add_rejected_path(o, ERROR_NOT_UPTODATE_DIR, ce->name);
> - free(pathbuf);
> return cnt;
> }
>
> --
> 2.33.0.1404.g83021034c5d