Re: sys/param.h

From: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 19, 2012, 07:59 UTC
Message-ID: <CABPQNSZQk6hHm-dWqFFQf0HF34Mvbjc8-mgzCr=G0zbBKiYUvA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vobhrgupr.fsf_-_@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

> Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> writes:
>
>>> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>>> It could turn out that we may be able to get rid of sys/param.h
>>>> altogether, but one step at a time.  Inputs from people on minority
>>>> platforms are very much appreciated---does your platform build fine
>>>> when the inclusion of the file is removed from git-compat-util.h?
>>
>> MinGW works fine with sys/param.h removed from git-compat-util.h.
>
> It seems that OpenBSD 5.2 does not mind it getting removed, either.
> Debian 5 and Debian 6 seem OK; so do Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04.  I have
> a hunch that Fedora or anything based on glibc would be fine, too.

And just to be sure; Fedora 17: OK.