Re: Re: [PATCH v2] config: preserve config file permissions on edits
- From
Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 19, 2014, 07:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABPQNSZMExeXXMEUNE9HneK1rfXeLoK=vHZkm38xKt_2VctjXQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <5379AF29.4000508@viscovery.net>
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> wrote:
Show 42 quoted lines
> Am 5/6/2014 2:17, schrieb Eric Wong:
>> Users may already store sensitive data such as imap.pass in
>> ..git/config; making the file world-readable when "git config"
>> is called to edit means their password would be compromised
>> on a shared system.
>>
>> [v2: updated for section renames, as noted by Junio]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
>> ---
>> config.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> t/t1300-repo-config.sh | 10 ++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
>> index a30cb5c..c227aa8 100644
>> --- a/config.c
>> +++ b/config.c
>> @@ -1636,6 +1636,13 @@ int git_config_set_multivar_in_file(const char *config_filename,
>> MAP_PRIVATE, in_fd, 0);
>> close(in_fd);
>>
>> + if (fchmod(fd, st.st_mode & 07777) < 0) {
>> + error("fchmod on %s failed: %s",
>> + lock->filename, strerror(errno));
>> + ret = CONFIG_NO_WRITE;
>> + goto out_free;
>> + }
>
> This introduces a severe failure in the Windows port because we do not
> implement fchmod. Existing fchmod invocations do not check the return
> value, and they are only interested in removing the write bits, and we
> generally don't care a lot if files remain writable.
>
> I'm not proficient enough to add any ACL fiddling to fchmod that would be
> required by the above change, whose purpose is to be strict about
> permissions. Nor am I interested (who the heck is sharing a Windows box
> anyway? ;-)
>
> Therefore, here's just a work-around patch to keep things going on
> Windows. Any opinions from the Windows corner?
>Since we use MSVCRT's chmod implementation directly which only checks for S_IWRITE,and Get/SetFileAttributes to simply set or clear the FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY-flag, perhaps we could do the same except using Get/SetFileInformationByHandle instead? That takes us in a better direction, IMO. Adding full ACL support seems like a bigger project.
If there's no objection, I'll sketch up a patch for that...
-- -- *** Please reply-to-all at all times *** *** (do not pretend to know who is subscribed and who is not) *** *** Please avoid top-posting. *** The msysGit Wiki is here: https://github.com/msysgit/msysgit/wiki - Github accounts are free. You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "msysGit" group. To post to this group, send email to msysgit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to msysgit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, and view previous threads, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/msysgit?hl=en_US?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "msysGit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to msysgit+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.