Re: [PATCH v5] worktree: add: introduce --checkout option
- From
Zhang Lei <zhanglei002@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 30, 2016, 03:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CABEEbiArWe+Tq2CYMw+54PkeOAnHqU+tw6iLDW2wRuGHJ964EQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cRimDGFDk7A2p2rKpJ2GR27_R=BJdpyPK4xeyDU1TruWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the review. Sorry for the patch churn, I wasn't quite familiar with working with mailing list.
2016-03-30 3:20 GMT+08:00 Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>:
Show 87 quoted lines
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Ray Zhang <zhanglei002@gmail.com> wrote:
>> By adding this option which defaults to true, we can use the
>> corresponding --no-checkout to make some customizations before
>> the checkout, like sparse checkout, etc.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ray Zhang <zhanglei002@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since last version of this patch[v4]:
>> t/t2025-worktree-add.sh: use test -e to test file existence.
>> builtin/worktree.c: refactor the code a little bit.
>
> Thanks, this version is still:
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
>
> A couple comments below...
>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
>> @@ -284,18 +285,22 @@ static int add_worktree(const char *path, const char *refname,
>> if (ret)
>> goto done;
>>
>> - cp.argv = NULL;
>> - argv_array_clear(&cp.args);
>> - argv_array_pushl(&cp.args, "reset", "--hard", NULL);
>> - cp.env = child_env.argv;
>> - ret = run_command(&cp);
>> - if (!ret) {
>> - is_junk = 0;
>> - free(junk_work_tree);
>> - free(junk_git_dir);
>> - junk_work_tree = NULL;
>> - junk_git_dir = NULL;
>> + if (opts->checkout) {
>> + cp.argv = NULL;
>> + argv_array_clear(&cp.args);
>> + argv_array_pushl(&cp.args, "reset", "--hard", NULL);
>> + cp.env = child_env.argv;
>> + ret = run_command(&cp);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto done;
>> }
>> +
>> + is_junk = 0;
>> + free(junk_work_tree);
>> + free(junk_git_dir);
>> + junk_work_tree = NULL;
>> + junk_git_dir = NULL;
>
> Doing the goto-dance and outdenting the "freeing" code as suggested as
> a possible improvement by [1] probably should have been done as a
> separate preparatory patch since the result in this patch is fairly
> noisy and more difficult to review. However, it's probably not worth
> the patch churn to do so now.
>
>> done:
>> strbuf_reset(&sb);
>> strbuf_addf(&sb, "%s/locked", sb_repo.buf);
>> diff --git a/t/t2025-worktree-add.sh b/t/t2025-worktree-add.sh
>> +test_expect_success '"add" worktree with --no-checkout' '
>> + git worktree add --no-checkout -b swamp swamp &&
>> + ! test -e swamp/init.t &&
>
> I realize that this was suggested by [2], however, a more modern way
> to state this would be:
>
> test_path_is_missing swamp/init.t &&
>
> but, as also mentioned in [2], it's probably not worth the patch churn
> to change it now.
>
>> + git -C swamp reset --hard &&
>> + test_cmp init.t swamp/init.t
>> +'
>> +
>> +test_expect_success '"add" worktree with --checkout' '
>> + git worktree add --checkout -b swmap2 swamp2 &&
>> + test_cmp init.t swamp2/init.t
>> +'
>> +
>> test_done
>
> [1]: http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/PATCH-add-option-n-no-checkout-to-git-worktree-add-tp7651385p7651884.html
>
> [2]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/290050