Re: Build without BUILT_INS
- From
Steven Penny <svnpenn@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 25, 2012, 03:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAAXzdLXa_s4yDzV4HJk3dV1hYU1cekMXqcvEvoPcDrTm0tAyXQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqmx61hmtu.fsf@junio.mtv.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> And no, it will *not* be a compilation option, as the resulting > installation will break the age-old promise we made to script writers.
A compilation option, does not break any promise to script writers.
The default build still has hard links.
A compilation option, such as "make NO_BUILTINS=1" would merely give users the choice to build without the hard links; an option they do _not_ have currently.
Seeing how there already is
NO_GETTEXT NO_OPENSSL NO_TCLTK
and so on, I dont see this as being a big issue to add.