Re: Problem with Integrated Vim Editor on Win 10
- From
- Zachary Turner <zturner@google.com>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2016, 17:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAAErz9jeLPU+QocSKNssknoJdZoi4Sq0YfZiNnpf4wD70JKQUQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAAErz9i1=EOemq2qNijRwgY6MNmPJRhV+mFfeD1FZa5uPwvCJw@mail.gmail.com>
I dug into this some more, and as surprising as it is, I believe the release of Git 2.8.0 is just busted. I had an installer for 2.7.0 lying around, so after uninstalling 2.8.0 and re-installing 2.7.0, everything works fine.
I'm not terribly active in the Git community so I don't know what the procedure is for things like this, but this seems like a fairly serious regression. Suggestions on how to proceed?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner@google.com> wrote:
Show 25 quoted lines
> Hi, just recently I installed the latest build of Windows 10 of my > machine. This is my second Win10 machine. On the other I am using git > 2.7.0.windows.1 and everything is working just fine. > > On the second machine I am using git 2.8.0.windows.1 and vim does not > work. I sent a bug report to bugs@vim.org, but frankly I don't know whose > bug this is, so I'm including it here as well. > > The problem is that vim is just a black screen when git launches it. If I > mash enough keys eventually I see something that resembles vim output at > the bottom, but I can't actually use it. > > I tried going into program files\git\usr\bin and just running vim.exe. > Again, black screen. If I press enter about 10 times I can see the > introduction screen. Then if I press : about 10-20 times it will go into > command mode and a single : appears. after pressing a few more keys all > the rest of the :s appear. Basically, everything is completely unusable. > > I tried downloading vim 7.4 from www.vim.org, and low and behold, it > works. For now I've replaced the copy of vim.exe that ships with git with > the copy from www.vim.org. But this leaves me nervous that something is > seriously wrong. > > Has anyone seen anything like this before, or have any ideas how I might > better diagnose this?