Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] remote: remove branch->merge_name and fix branch_release()
- From
Lidong Yan <yldhome2d2@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 21, 2025, 02:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA42712D-C127-4142-9424-2A512F9488CB@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqecve0yvz.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 16 quoted lines
> > Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> writes: > >> This end result is cleaner, and avoids duplicating the merge names >> twice. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> >> Link: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20250617-jk-submodule-helper-use-url-v2-1-04cbb003177d@gmail.com/ >> --- >> remote.h | 4 ++-- >> branch.c | 4 ++-- >> builtin/pull.c | 2 +- >> remote.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > This unfortunately makes t5582 segfault.
I used Clang's Address Sanitizer and found that the segmentation fault was caused by the following two null pointer dereferences.
==501602==Hint: address points to the zero page.
#0 0x72be47ec6ce1 in strcmp ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:465
#1 0x5d7e2f246b11 in do_fetch builtin/fetch.c:1732==501614==Hint: address points to the zero page.
#0 0x7b9812ac6ce1 in strcmp ../../../../src/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:465
#1 0x64e39a76cdc1 in get_ref_map builtin/fetch.c:555I believe this is because we didn't update the corresponding branch_has_merge_config() function. In the previous implementation, if branch->remote_name was a null pointer, branch_has_merge_config() would return false. However, PATCH[v3 1/7] broke this convention.
The solution could be:
- Replace !!branch->merge with branch->set_merge in branch_has_merge_config().
- Replace free(branch->merge) with FREE_AND_NULL(branch->merge) in merge_release()
to prevent double free.I test my solution locally by just running t5582 and it passed.
---
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c index dff76e4626..ee95126f3f 100644 --- a/remote.c +++ b/remote.c @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void merge_clear(struct branch *branch) refspec_item_clear(branch->merge[i]); free(branch->merge[i]); } - free(branch->merge); + FREE_AND_NULL(branch->merge); branch->merge_nr = 0; } @@ -1788,7 +1788,7 @@ struct branch *branch_get(const char *name) int branch_has_merge_config(struct branch *branch) { - return branch && !!branch->merge; + return branch && branch->set_merge; } int branch_merge_matches(struct branch *branch, ---