git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: The master branch rename, and avoiding another v1.6.0 git-foo fiasco

From
Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com>
Date
Nov 19, 2020, 21:29 UTC
Message-ID
<CA+sFfMdHrapy2o8D53dpqA5b+a88VLOX126daLcC8Sash4rq3A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<20201119133705.7q7yghymvvo7zeq4@chatter.i7.local>

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 5:37 AM Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

Show 14 quoted lines
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 05:02:59PM -0800, Brandon Casey wrote:
> > > This *really* is not hard; which is why I am starting to suspect
> > > people are really kvetching because their objections are really more
> > > about the woke/anti-woke aspect of the "master" -> "main" migration
> > > --- and they are using *think* the children^H^H^H^H^H^H^H users as a
> > > rhetorical device.
> >
> > So we're changing the default branch name from "master" to "main"?
>
> To my knowledge, there are no concrete plans to change anything at this
> time. All recent work was to remove any special-case treatment of
> "master" as the default branch name, so people are free to use any
> configuration they like.

Glad to hear that. That doesn't seem to be the perspective that others have in this discussion thread though, especially since Theodore Ts'o referred to "...the "master" -> "main" migration" in his comment that I quoted above.

Thanks for trying to respond to my questions, but I think your responses are mostly misdirected towards an issue that I was not referring to. That being the configurability of the default branch name, which I doubt anyone has a problem with, as opposed to changing the default branch name for all newly created repositories and possibly for the git repo itself for some supposed offensiveness of the word "master". That is what I consider silly.

For example, when I asked "So we're changing the default branch name from "master" to "main"?" and then followed that up with "For what purpose?", the latter question was asking "For what purpose are we changing the default branch name from "master" to "main"?", and then "What problem are we trying to solve by changing the default branch name from "master" to "main"?" etc.

-Brandon
Previous: Konstantin RyabitsevNext: Felipe Contreras
Message 18 of 25 in “The master branch rename, and avoiding another v1.6.0 git-foo fiasco”
  1. Felipe ContrerasNov 13, 2020
  2. brian m. carlsonNov 13, 2020
  3. Felipe ContrerasNov 13, 2020
  4. Theodore Y. Ts'oNov 13, 2020
  5. Felipe ContrerasNov 13, 2020
  6. Theodore Y. Ts'oNov 13, 2020
  7. Felipe ContrerasNov 13, 2020
  8. Michal SuchánekNov 13, 2020
  9. Lukasz NiemierNov 14, 2020
  10. Theodore Y. Ts'oNov 15, 2020
  11. Felipe ContrerasNov 15, 2020
  12. Brandon CaseyNov 19, 2020
  13. Peter HadlawNov 19, 2020
  14. Konstantin RyabitsevNov 19, 2020
  15. Junio C HamanoNov 19, 2020
  16. Felipe ContrerasNov 19, 2020
  17. Konstantin RyabitsevNov 20, 2020
  18. Brandon CaseyNov 19, 2020
  19. Felipe ContrerasNov 20, 2020
  20. Don Goodman-WilsonNov 13, 2020
  21. Ismael LucenoNov 20, 2020
  22. Felipe ContrerasNov 13, 2020
  23. Philippe BlainNov 13, 2020
  24. Felipe ContrerasNov 13, 2020
  25. WhinisNov 23, 2020

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.