Re: Reviews on mailing-list
- From
Deniz Türkoglu <deniz@spotify.com>
- Date
- Nov 11, 2012, 01:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+ZXwZO8tpGi7_njbFx6w2ZAWoySVb2Bcc+DSupLenKrNAGV_A@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s2AvaAs-dn_eoSFWoLHBQk5QrrV=zYTOpRi2nEywoua4w@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Deniz Türkoglu <deniz@spotify.com> wrote: > >> This is my first mail to the git mailing list. I have been following >> the list for some time now and I would like to suggest moving the >> reviews out of the mailing list, for example to a gerrit instance, I >> believe it would improve the commits and the mailing list. I have a >> filter on 'PATCH', but I feel I miss some of the discussion, and >> things that I would be interested in. >> >> I have spoken to Shawn Pearce (gerrit project lead, google) and he >> said he is OK with hosting the gerrit instance. >> >> I would like to hear your thoughts on this. > > Personally I think reviews on the mailing list is far superior than > any other review methods. I've even blogged about it and all the > reasons[1]. Gerrit is better than bugzilla, but it still requires a > web browser, and logging in.
I disagree that the current approach is optimal. Bugzilla is a bug-tracker and is not meant to be used for reviews. I believe in using the right tool for the right job. An e-mail should be concise and to the point, in this case only contain the discussion. This will help it to reach a wider audience and be more useful when people stumble upon it through a google search.
cheers, -deniz