Re: [PATCH] status: show in-progress info for short status

> Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Personally, I would want this to become the default and not have a new
>> option to trigger it. I think we could also extend the porcelain
>> format to include this information as well, but I'm not too familiar
>> with how the v2 format extends or not.
>
> I think the general rule of thumb for --porcelain is that we can
> freely introduce new record types without version bump, and expect
> the reading scripts to ignore unrecognised records (we may need to
> describe this a bit more strongly in our document, though), while
> changes to the format of existing records must require a command
> line option that cannot be turned on by default with configuration
> (or a version bump, if you want to change the output format by
> default).
>
> I am getting the impression that this "we are doing X" is a new and
> discinct record type that existing readers can safely ignore?  If
> that is the case, it may be better to add it without making it
> optional.