Re: [PATCH RFC] diff: add SUBMODULE_DIFF format to display submodule diff
- From
Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 9, 2016, 22:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+P7+xqnALzwkgLXrP57BUtFGaxGudAEG7cmGTakP47ofFEjHQ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kbzDhpsfpY8s=7O86_dNLA=VRkyC=8eiCqMambKvUnXmw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> wrote: >> From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> >> >> For projects which have frequent updates to submodules it is often >> useful to be able to see a submodule update commit as a difference. >> Teach diff's --submodule= a new "diff" format which will execute a diff >> for the submodule between the old and new commit, and display it as >> a standard diff. This allows users to easily see what changed in >> a submodule without having to dig into the submodule themselves. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> >> --- >> There are no tests yet. Stefan suggested the use of child_process, > > Well you said "I just want this one command but don't know where to put it " > so it's natural to suggest using child_process. ;)
Right this is a straight forward way..
Show 9 quoted lines
> >> but I >> really believe there has to be some way of getting the diff without >> having to run a sub process (as this means we also can't do the diff >> without a checked out submodule). It doesn't properly handle options >> either, so a better solution would be much appreciated. > > Oh right, we would need to codify all options again (and all future options, > too)
That's why I'd prefer if we had a way to do this via builtins, because it would make option passing easier.
Show 16 quoted lines
> >> >> I also would prefer if the diff actually prefixed the files with >> "path/to/submodule" so that it was obvious where the file was located in >> the directory. >> >> Suggestions welcome. >> >> + >> + if (start_command(&cp)) > > I wonder if we want to stay single-execution here, > i.e. if we rather want to use run_processes_parallel > for all the submodules at the same time? > > Though then non deterministic ordering may be an issue.
There is no easy way to do this, we're given it one module at a time and it would be a huge re-write to make it go in parallel. I think that's the wrong way to think about this.
Show 8 quoted lines
> >> + return -1; >> + >> + if (strbuf_read(buf, cp.out, 0) < 0) > > So we keep the whole diff in memory > I don't know much about the diff machinery, but I thought > the rest of the diff machinery just streams it out?
Yea, but I can't figure out how to do that. Is there an easy way to stream chunks from the pipe straight into the file?
Show 30 quoted lines
>
>> +
>> +void show_submodule_diff(FILE *f, const char *path,
>> + const char *line_prefix,
>> + unsigned char one[20], unsigned char two[20],
>> + unsigned dirty_submodule, const char *meta,
>> + const char *reset)
>> +{
>> + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
>> + struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
>> + const char *message = NULL;
>> +
>> + if (dirty_submodule & DIRTY_SUBMODULE_UNTRACKED)
>> + fprintf(f, "%sSubmodule %s contains untracked content\n",
>> + line_prefix, path);
>> + if (dirty_submodule & DIRTY_SUBMODULE_MODIFIED)
>> + fprintf(f, "%sSubmodule %s contains modified content\n",
>> + line_prefix, path);
>> +
>> + if (!hashcmp(one, two)) {
>> + strbuf_release(&sb);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (add_submodule_odb(path))
>> + message = "(not checked out)";
>
> When not checked out, we can invoke the diff command
> in .git/modules/<name> as that is the git dir of the submodule,
> i.e. operating diff with a bare repo?We can actually do this every time. How would you pass that in a child_process? I don't think it's "dir" but instead passing "--git-dir" somehow?
Thanks, Jake
> > Thanks, > Stefan