Re: Making it possible to do “git push origin” instead of “git push origin <branch>”, without having to one-time prepare each branch for it
- From
Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 22, 2016, 21:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+P7+xpdKEoNY_cgY4g3bMVZe0p-2bYT4Y-3nYyd0O03iD1nZg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAJtFkWtjowyGaFfsCVd-HAZM2-3e0=CkkyYfxne8KRdYq5kJ9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Stefan Monov <logixoul@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 30 quoted lines
> Hi. > > I'd like to use just: > > git push > > or at most: > > git push origin > > rather than having to first check which is the active branch with `git > branch --list`, then type: > > git push origin <branch> > > At [1] and [2] I've seen that if I do this once: > > git push -u origin <branch> > > then from then on I can use just `git push` _for that branch_. > However, I don't want to do this "setup" step for each branch, because > it's extra work that I also may forget to do. > > Why is this "setup" step necessary and can I avoid it? > > Thanks, > Stefan > > [1] http://stackoverflow.com/q/19312622 > [2] http://stackoverflow.com/q/6529136
Try setting "push.default" configuration setting, see "git help config" and search for push.default
I *think* what you want is "push.default = current" but you should read up on each option.
Thanks, Jake