git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Adding --force-if-newer flag to git push

From
EEErik Cervin Edin <erik@cervined.in>
Date
Oct 25, 2022, 07:56 UTC
Message-ID
<CA+JQ7M_woJmQdaB24-eNxSRJLN4GPgTyZcPfKsXAkP+B1QOT-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<491oWe6HDMJXQK2Ru2VbzFrlUajNlVhnIErZZ1dxUaPpCElsgpASAEQFc2Zi1R4G53hAIMHopETEJn7E_TzeeC6uOzGBffQDRK2AWYPIxKQ=@protonmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 7:02 PM Sergey <sryze@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sometimes I find that a feature like this would be useful when I work on multiple different computers and I want to just push all local branches to the repo at once to sync it with whatever is the latest version. I know that using --force is kind of frowned upon in the Git community, so this is probably not the best idea because it would promote usage of this feature among the users. I just wanted to know your opinions and see if someone else would find it useul or it's just a dumb idea.
Once you know the relevant options, it's pretty trivial to roll your
own script/workflow/configuration that suits your own work case. I'll
share how I solve the problem you describe. First, I'd like to mention
  git pull --rebase
which is basically
  git fetch origin && git rebase @{upstream}
or
  git pull --rebase=merges
which is basically
  git fetch origin && git rebase --rebase-merges @{upstream}
This does a fetch and afterwards, attempts to rebase any local changes
on top of the remote tracking branch. I'd recommend this approach over
force pushing. It keeps forced history rewrites away from the upstream
repository, which is generally best reserved for "truer" or more
finished work. It also allows for better recovery, in case you mess
up, chances are your history is preserved in the reflog. This can be
configured as the default either globally, per repo or per branch
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config#Documentation/git-config.txt-pullrebase
Be aware that there are potential situations where this will not
automagically resolve the difference in history in a way that you may
expect and I'd only configure this as default if you feel comfortable
rolling back in case that situation arises. As a starting point, you
can manually initialize the rebase using @{upstream} or @{U}
 git fetch
 git rebase @{U}
If you want to investigate the divergence between a local branch and
its upstream, there are several commands that may be useful depending
on exactly how you want to compare them (often situational in my
experience.) The see which is newer you can run
  git show -q --format=fuller HEAD HEAD@{U}
but sometimes you want to know more say, how do the trees differ
  git log --online --graph HEAD...HEAD@{U}
or perhaps the difference in contents
  git diff HEAD HEAD@{U}
etc. etc.
Happy hunting!
Previous: Junio C Hamano
Message 3 of 3 in “Adding --force-if-newer flag to git push”
  1. SergeyOct 22, 2022
  2. Junio C HamanoOct 22, 2022
  3. Erik Cervin EdinOct 25, 2022

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.