Re: [PATCHv2 10/19] git-submodule.sh: convert test -a/-o to && and ||
- From
Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 22, 2014, 08:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+EOSB=wqBUb_QB6XtK0v4Lsux1mG7wCvXP3XVeDe7o=ofsYFA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqha4is3yd.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
2014-05-22 8:49 GMT+02:00 Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>:
Show 28 quoted lines
> Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> writes: > >> This is version 2 of the patch to git-submodule of the >> patch series "convert test -a/-o to && and ||". >> It contains the fixes identified by Johannes and >> Matthieu. > > This version of the patch (not the whole series) is > > Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> > > Some comments for next time: > > * I agree with Johannes that splitting the series with one patch per > file is not the right way to split. As a reviewer, I want to > > - check that -a trivially translates to && > - check that -o trivially translates to || > - check non-trivial cases > > Interleaving these cases (especially the trivial and non-trivial > cases) makes the review much harder. For this kind of series, the > change is trivial, but the review is not (Johannes caught a || Vs && > inversion that I didn't find for example, which is quite serious), so > the "optimize your patches for review" is even more important than > usual. > > * Again, to avoid mixing trivial and non-trivial changes, ...
First of all, thank you. I will take note of your valuable suggestions for the future.
Show 14 quoted lines
>
>> @@ -1059,13 +1059,17 @@ cmd_summary() {
>> while read mod_src mod_dst sha1_src sha1_dst status sm_path
>> do
>> # Always show modules deleted or type-changed (blob<->module)
>> - test $status = D -o $status = T && echo "$sm_path" && continue
>> + case "$status" in
>> + [DT])
>> + printf '%s\n' "$sm_path" &&
>> + continue
>> + esac
>
> turning a echo into a printf is good, but would be better done
> separately.I had thought, but the change was in the fix of Johannes, and it did not think was right to change this, especially that it was right anyway. But I understand very well the observation.
Best Regards
> > -- > Matthieu Moy > http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/