Re: Git performance results on a large repository
- From
- Chris Lee <chris133@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 3, 2012, 23:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CA+B68xBG8c3eMg5ULUYgmZ4vTiSgvu2nEFfgTD1m0-dLhLKZhg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CB5074CF.3AD7A%joshua.redstone@fb.com>
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Joshua Redstone <joshua.redstone@fb.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> [snip] > > The git performance we observed here is too slow for our needs. So the > question becomes, if we want to keep using git going forward, what's the > best way to improve performance. It seems clear we'll probably need some > specialized servers (e.g., to perform git-blame quickly) and maybe > specialized file system integration to detect what files have changed in a > working tree.
Have you considered upgrading all of engineering to SSDs? 200+GB SSDs are under $400USD nowadays.
-clee