RE: for newbs = little exercise / tutorial / warmup for windows and other non-sophisticated new Git users :-) [Scanned]

From: Conor Rafferty <conor.rafferty@altmore.co.uk>
Date: Dec 31, 2008, 10:56 UTC
Message-ID: <BB5F02FD3789B54E8964D38D6775E718242D37@ALTMORE-SVR.altmore.local>

Haha, no probs

Neither does the job

I either need to figure out how the indexes get involved in the dot version, Or give in and create a branch - that's how you guys work mainly, so that use case will no doubt work Or find something else to do the job - mercurial looks promising

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Whiteside [mailto:jeff.m.whiteside@gmail.com] 
Sent: 31 December 2008 02:36
To: Conor Rafferty
Cc: Daniel Barkalow; Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.; git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: for newbs = little exercise / tutorial / warmup for windows
and other non-sophisticated new Git users :-) [Scanned]

sir, i believe you're not reading what is typed.

Show 9 quoted lines

> wtf is wrong with
>
> git checkout <something>
>
> ??
>
> ** It doesn't reliably put the files that were in that revision into 
> the working directory - a fairly major flaw, for what I'm using SCM 
> for (and 80% of the market IMHO)

yes it does. your example uses "git checkout versionB .", which is NOT "git checkout <something>" we are suggesting you do "git checkout versionB" which is different (HINT: there is NO dot), and which i'm 99% positive will work.

if you still disagree, then i'm sure mercurial will be sufficient for your needs, and all your dcvs book-lernin' over christmas will be transferrable.

good luck with whatever option you choose.