Re: [PATCH] Colourise git-branch output
- From
Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
- Date
- Dec 12, 2006, 01:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BAYC1-PASMTP092A9E80667F373BF69AA6AED70@CEZ.ICE>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7iwx2a0z.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:11:24 -0800 Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > As Junio already highlighted, the "branch.*" namespace is for actual > > branch names. This config option should go into "color.branch" or some > > other spot. > > I didn't. And "branch.color = auto" is actually fine. > > The problematic case is "branch.color.remote = purple".
Technically it is workable.. but why even start down the road of having anything but branch names after a "branch."? There has to be a better spot for this variable, and it makes it more future proof, as you highlighted.