Re: [DRAFT] Branching and merging with git
- From
Sean <seanlkml@sympatico.ca>
- Date
- Nov 17, 2006, 16:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <BAYC1-PASMTP021B5A7CD192CD4D37A152AEE80@CEZ.ICE>
- In-Reply-To
- <fcaeb9bf0611170819j57cda9e1ia4ecd4cd13956447@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 23:19:23 +0700 "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> Or.. find a way to merge cogito back to git :-) > /me runs into a nearest bush.
Pasky has already given a lot to Git, and it would be great to see even more merged back into Git where a consensus can be reached. In fact Pasky has said that his plan is to push a lot more towards Git and make Cogito a thinner UI layer. Either way, there's absolutely nothing wrong with people choosing to use Cogito rather than Git. It's just that the separate Cogito tool shouldn't have a place on the Git website any more prominent than say StGit does.
The Git website should be a place where Git makes the best case it can for _itself_, not for its sister tools. It's a distraction and gets in the way of promoting Git as a stand alone tool. At least one new user has complained that it was confusing.
Personally I have nothing against Cogito, I just think Pasky should separate his role as Git webmaster from his role as Cogito author. If people have good ideas for Git documentation, the website would be a natural place for it, and it shouldn't have to compete with Cogito tutorials etc.