I understand, I shall copy the empty config and paste into a new ignored file where I then add my personal customizations.
What if, however, all git commands besides ‘git pull’ and ‘git fetch’, are able to modify the files in question. Would we then have a potential new git feature?
Show 54 quoted lines
> On Aug 3, 2023, at 2:38 PM, brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
>
> On 2023-08-03 at 17:17:15, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>>> Am 03.08.23 um 07:35 schrieb Hilco Wijbenga:
>>> I think you might be looking for "git update-index --assume-unchanged
>>> <file>"? See https://www.git-scm.com/docs/git-update-index for more
>>> details.
>>
>> Sorry to tell you that this is a myth that lives on because it is
>> repeated over and over again.
>
> This is indeed false.
>
>>> This allows you to tell Git to ignore the changes you made to that
>>> (tracked) file.
>>
>> No. --assume-unchanged allows you to make the *promise* to Git that you
>> will not change the file, and consequently Git does not have to check
>> whether the file was changed. If you break the promise (because you
>> change it), you will get what you deserve. For example, you may find
>> that Git overwrites your changes, or commits them nevertheless.
>>
>> Perhaps a better choice is --skip-worktree, but recent answers on
>> Stackoverflow point out that even that is not a suitable solution for
>> "please, Git, ignore these changes".
>
> Neither of these is an acceptable option. Here's an entry from the FAQ,
> which I have referred to several times (on StackOverflow and elsewhere):
>
> How do I ignore changes to a tracked file?
>
> Git doesn't provide a way to do this. The reason is that if Git needs
> to overwrite this file, such as during a checkout, it doesn't know
> whether the changes to the file are precious and should be kept, or
> whether they are irrelevant and can safely be destroyed. Therefore,
> it has to take the safe route and always preserve them.
>
> It's tempting to try to use certain features of `git update-index`,
> namely the assume-unchanged and skip-worktree bits, but these don't
> work properly for this purpose and shouldn't be used this way.
>
> If your goal is to modify a configuration file, it can often be
> helpful to have a file checked into the repository which is a template
> or set of defaults which can then be copied alongside and modified as
> appropriate. This second, modified file is usually ignored to prevent
> accidentally committing it.
>
> There's no option to do this and you should adopt a different approach.
> Probably 95% of the circumstances I see where people are trying to
> ignore tracked files can be done by moving the original file to another
> path and using a script to copy and modify the file to an ignored path.
> --
> brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
> Toronto, Ontario, CA