Re: git diff --summary only seems to work when combined with --stat
- From
- demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 7, 2010, 06:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTinOCR1UpgZJNyxQNUTgK1A603YhOoEy-y-0v8AP@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTinuQoJLfDq8HhUd=FLoqosVD23MU6ch6Ea2iVSJ@mail.gmail.com>
On 7 December 2010 07:53, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 38 quoted lines
> On 6 December 2010 22:03, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Yves,
>>
>> demerphq wrote:
>>
>>> It seems like the --summary option only works in combination --stat.
>>>
>>> It doesn't seem to work if I use it by itself, nor in combination with
>>> --name-status or --num-stat. And depending on the order, it either
>>> does nothing, or causes a usage note.
>>
>> It is tricky, but as you noticed --summary is not actually about the
>> diffstat. --summary affects the output summarizing new files and
>> renamed files.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> $ git diff --summary v1.7.2..v1.7.3
>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/RelNotes-1.5.0.1.txt
>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/RelNotes-1.5.0.2.txt
>> [...]
>>
>>> $ git diff --name-status --sumary HEAD^
>>> usage: git diff <options> <rev>{0,2} -- <path>*
>>
>> There is an 'm' missing here. :)
>
> Thanks for your reply. It turns out that was a mis-paste. I tried both
> splelings of summary. ;-)
>
> And none of them produce output.
>
> $ git diff --summary HEAD^..HEAD
> $ git diff --summary HEAD^^..HEAD
> $ git diff --summary HEAD..HEAD^
> $ git diff --summary HEAD^
>
> So why does it work for you but not for me?Ah. Not enough coffee. It "doesnt work" because I am not adding or renaming a file here?
Yves
-- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"