git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Git repo on a machine with zero commits is ahead of remote by 103 commits.. !

From
Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Date
Jan 25, 2011, 07:23 UTC
Message-ID
<AANLkTinC7yvHJj_onRRWBYaZ23Pvs0JB2DJT44Jy-JLG@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<AANLkTikj06sjTbNd8afk9cY2=_Hy+kT+J1NCjR-fKP5J@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Srirang Doddihal <om.brahmana@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 5 quoted lines
> 1) Why does "git status"  say that the local repo on the deployed
> machine (where no commits are made) is ahead of the remote by 103
> commits? (This number, 103, increases with every "git pull origin
> master" and very likely the change is equal to the number of commits
> pulled)

git status is comparing refs/heads/master, aka master, to its remote-tracking branch, refs/remotes/origin/master, aka origin/master.

master is ahead of origin/master because you've been updating the former but not the later, with your pull invocation.

> 2) Why is "git log orign/master" stuck at a Jan 8th commit?

Because you've been saying "git pull origin master", git has been doing the following:

- contacting origin and fetching all commits in its master not in your
local repo
- locally updating FETCH_HEAD with the results of that fetch
- performing a merge operation of FETCH_HEAD into your local master
- because you haven't made any local commits, that is a fast-forward operation
- updating your work tree
However, git is not updating your remote-tracking branch (origin/master).
> * How can I set these right?

Just do a "git pull" or "git pull origin". By not explicitly giving pull a branch, it consults two configuration variables in your .git/config for the currently checked out branch to figure out what you want it to do, namely:

  branch.master.remote
  branch.master.merge
Also in this case, it updates the origin/master remote-tracking branch.

(I think there has been previous discussion about this behavior - it seems broken to me that "git pull <remote> <branch>" doesn't update the corresponding remote-tracking branch <remote>/<branch> in the case where "git pull [<remote>]" would normally do so according to that repo's .git/config.)

j.
Previous: Johannes SixtNext: Srirang Doddihal
Message 3 of 4 in “Git repo on a machine with zero commits is ahead of remote by 103 commits.. !”
  1. Srirang DoddihalJan 25, 2011
  2. Johannes SixtJan 25, 2011
  3. Jay SoffianJan 25, 2011
  4. Srirang DoddihalJan 25, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.