Re: rfc - Changing the way gitk and git-gui are managed
- From
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2010, 06:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTin9kbMp5nOS=GaM2rX1w+y8vbzYfWunkSSeoPZg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTimdYfv-Z57iHD+YLfjKi66av5xmaC3JEMRNRw+Y@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 21:39, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Somebody off-list suggested removing gitk and git-gui directories from my >> repository and I've been playing with the idea and kind of like the end >> result. > > The neighboring thread [0] about git subtree seems highly relevant to > this decision. Avery, do you perhaps any additional insights wrt this > particular use case?
Only this: Junio said that there are no major downsides to this change - and given the slow pace of change in gitk/git-gui, this is probably true - but are there any *upsides*? What problem does this solve?
git-submodule and git-subtree solve different problems, so which one is "better" depends on the problem to be solved. As a mostly-just-user of git, whatever is currently being done is super convenient and easy for me and I wouldn't ask for any change at all. Obviously it might be very different from Junio's point of view :)
Have fun,
Avery