finding if a commit is needed
- From
Geoff Russell <geoffrey.russell@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 28, 2010, 08:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTin4o=uNBFELYMb8TDA=taGJyqpLvgxZcPFr+Pq+@mail.gmail.com>
We have an interface which "rolls back" commits to a previous time in a set of data files using read-tree.
Works great ... but sometimes there are files which have been changed in the working tree which cause read-tree to fail. The files should have been committed but weren't. "git read-tree -i" isn't appropriate because we want to commit these files before the read-tree rolls them back ... because they are changes which might be resurrected and we don't want to lose them altogether.
So ...
git commit -a -m "something" && git read-tree ...
Doesn't work when there are no files which need committing ...
git commit -a -m "something" || git read-tree ...
Doesn't work when there are.
Is there something which can test whether a commit is needed?
I define "needed" as meaning when git commit -a would make a non-identical commit.
Many thanks, Geoff.