Re: [RFC] rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specified
- From
Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 17, 2010, 02:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTin+3FuuX_pavZQMrbi4qxjTRvM7nHk1PXcFbeiZ@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20101113095140.GH8911@home.lan>
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Yann Dirson <ydirson@free.fr> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:55:49PM +0100, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote: > >> @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ If <branch> is specified, 'git rebase' will perform an automatic >> `git checkout <branch>` before doing anything else. Otherwise >> it remains on the current branch. >> >> +If <upstream> is not specified, the upstream configured in >> +branch.<name>.remote and branch.<name>.merge options will be used; see >> +linkgit:git-config[1] for details. >> + > > Maybe make explicit that it will abort when no upstream is configured.
Will do.
Show 41 quoted lines
>
>> @@ -416,9 +409,31 @@ esac
>>
>> if test -z "$rebase_root"
>> then
>> - # The upstream head must be given. Make sure it is valid.
>> - upstream_name="$1"
>> - shift
>> + case "$#" in
>> + 0) branch_name=$(git symbolic-ref -q HEAD) &&
>> + upstream_name=$(git for-each-ref \
>> + --format='%(upstream)' ${branch_name})
>> + if test -z $branch_name
>> + then
>> + die "You are not currently on a branch, so I cannot use any
>> +'branch.<branchname>.merge' in your configuration file.
>> +Please specify which upstream branch you want to use on the command
>> +line and try again (e.g. 'git rebase <upstream branch>').
>> +See git-rebase(1) for details."
>> + elif test -z $upstream_name
>> + then
>> + die "You asked me to rebase without telling me which branch you
>> +want to rebase against, and 'branch.${branch_name#refs/heads/}.merge' in
>> +your configuration file does not tell me, either. Please
>> +specify which branch you want to use on the command line and
>> +try again (e.g. 'git rebase <upstream branch>').
>> +See git-rebase(1) for details."
>> + fi
>> + ;;
>> + *) upstream_name="$1"
>> + shift
>> + ;;
>> + esac
>> upstream=`git rev-parse --verify "${upstream_name}^0"` ||
>> die "invalid upstream $upstream_name"
>> unset root_flag
>
> What about simply checking if "rev-parse @{u}" succeeds, in which case
> we can use upstream_name=@{u} ? If it fails, then we can do the work
> of finding where the config flaw is (and delegate this to a func).
> That would help keep the nominal code path short.Will make sure to find out the error only when needed as you suggest.
I thought I would need the ref name to be able to walk the reflog if my other propasal would be accepted (see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/161381), but it seems to work with @{u} as well. I just adapted the call from 'git pull' (git-parse-remote.sh), but I guess I could use 'git rev-parse @{upstream}' instead. It does seem more natural to me.
Maybe one of the guys on the CC list can advise?