Re: Advice on choosing git
- From
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 12, 2010, 09:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTimIfAZp0ywpwMyllp3QtmO2Js6H1HhkP4l47bGl@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4BEA4B46.6010009@smartmediacorp.com>
Hi,
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Noah Silverman <noah@smartmediacorp.com> wrote:
> I'm looking for both a version control system and backup system.
I recommend git for versioning and bup [1] for backup.
> Bazaar also looks like a possible option, but I'm not sure it handles > drive usage better. Their website has a lengthy manifesto about how > they're better than Git, but I don't have enough experience with either > to make an informed decision.
Scott Chacon maintains this page [2] that compares Git with other versioning systems. From my personal experience, I find Bazaar to be quite horrible and slow. Mercurial is user-friendly, but nowhere near Git in terms of speed, power, and size.
-- Ram
[1] http://github.com/apenwarr/bup [2] http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/