Re: GIT as binary repository
- From
Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 21, 2010, 14:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTim6qsUDf5LS7C9o+C92Aqh7CohLLJ=+13BE3Tze@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <2EBB46ACFCD6CF48B45E2B1865BD02338037D36B4E@GVW1098EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Wilson, Kevin Lee (OpenView Engineer) <kevin.l.wilson@hp.com> wrote:
> We are investigating the use of GIT as a binary repository solution. Our larger files are near 800MB and the total checked out repo size is about 3 GB the repo size in SVN is more like 20-30GB, if we could prune the history prior to MR, we could get these sizes down considerably. This binary repo is really for our super project build. From what I have read and learned, this is not a good fit for the GIT tool. Have there been performance improvements lately? Some of the posts I have read have been quite old?
check this out:
http://github.com/apenwarr/bup
It's a modified git system that's purpose-built for large files. That's just about all the sensible information I can share you with you.
-- Cheers, Ray Chuan