Re: Git roadmap (How read What's cooking in git.git)
- From
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 16, 2010, 13:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTim4FOixgxUjv24o9gTNqK3DWafmpNtDVMA+PS9d@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTimtUz3L0F_iOpH7YuYpyoutPqtevPj-Tjo6MRcs@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 13:53, Sebastien Douche <sdouche@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I'm starting a french blog[1] on git to support workshops[2]. The goal > is to explain deeply the philosophy, the commands and subcommands, > workflows, etc. And also to aggregate headlines of the git world, > follow events and announce git releases. For the latter, it's a bit > hard (for a non core developer) to follow the development. From your > point of view, how we could set up a roadmap and a "what's new"?
Projects that have a "Roadmap" are usually the ones that have paid developers, where someone will centrally plan what things get worked on. Then assign developers to those tasks.
Git is a free software project. So it can't have a "Roadmap" in the same sense.
What we'll end up implementing is a function of what patches people send, and which of those patches end up passing review and get into git.git.
You can get something like a roadmap just by following what people are working on, and asking them what they want to do next.