Re: [PATCH v2] do not depend on signed integer overflow
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 31 quoted lines
> Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>
>> +++ b/git-compat-util.h
>> @@ -28,6 +28,15 @@
>> #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0]))
>> #define bitsizeof(x) (CHAR_BIT * sizeof(x))
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Signed integer overflow is undefined in C, so here's a helper macro
>> + * to detect if the sum of two integers will overflow. The bitsize to
>> + * overflow at is taken from the first parameter, which must be zero
>> + * or positive.
>> + */
>> +#define signed_add_overflows(a, b) \
>> + ((b) > ((INTMAX_MAX >> (bitsizeof(intmax_t) - bitsizeof(a))) - (a)))
>
> Yes, I still like it. This could be made closer to self-documenting
> like so:
>
> #define maximum_signed_value_of_type(a) \
> (INTMAX_MAX >> (bitsizeof(intmax_t) - bitsizeof(a)))
>
> /*
> * Signed overflow is undefined in C, so here's a helper macro
> * to detect if the sum of two signed integers will overflow.
> *
> * Requires: a >= 0, typeof(a) equals typeof(b)
> */
> #define signed_add_overflows(a, b) \
> ((b) > maximum_signed_value_of_type(a) - (a))
>
I like that. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll roll a new version.