Re: Running git on Windows command line
- From
Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@googlemail.com>
- Date
- Jul 22, 2010, 21:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTil69VdTLldEcInFcYLwcStFnEEkoBCAWS1kd-S6@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1A9EA7E081C3FE46A0F446FFB66D10EB939DAC@FL01EXMB01.trad.tradestation.com>
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:55 PM, John Dlugosz <JDlugosz@tradestation.com> wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
>> It sounds to me like you've installed indeed Git for Windows (which is >> the end-user product from the msysGit-project); the msysGit installers >> doesn't show a wizard with questions, it just installs a >> self-contained development environment. >> >> You can tell the packages apart by the name: >> * Git-something.exe and PortableGit-something.exe are installers for >> Git for Windows. >> * msysGit-netinstall-something.exe and >> msysGit-fullinstall-something.exe are installers for msysGit, the >> development environment used to develop Git for Windows. >> >> I hope this clears up a bit. >> >> -- >> Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund > > OK, "Git-1.7.0.2-preview20100309.exe" installed something that identifies itself as "git version 1.7.0.2.msysgit.0" > > The web page is identified as "msysgit" with "git for windows" in small type under it, which I take to be a descriptive statement, not a product name also. The downloads call them "Full installer for official Git" (what I used) and "...if you want to hack on Git". > > The usage on this mailing list has always been "msysgit" as this windows variant git, as opposed to the Cygwin build. Mentioning that is necessary for accurate help. I mentioned msysgit as the keyword necessary when asking for help, not to mean I installed the development source.
I'm aware of all this, but I don't think you're hearing me: the reason why the behavior has changed for you is very likely to be you having switched package. Yes, the naming is confusing.
-- Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund