Re: set-upstream for existing branch...?
- From
Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 17, 2011, 07:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTikqj8NjLwR647E1tHUuDO=OitUJ1dm5Fs7gtXXt@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <buoei77xmpc.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com>
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
> Is there a convenient, intuitive, way to set (or change) @{upstream} for
> the current branch, without doing anything else...?$ git branch <current_branch> --set-upstream <new_upstream>
But note that this is deceptive: what's important is the relative positions of <current_branch> and <new_upstream> on the command-line, and they must be in that order. It doesn't (currently) matter where you place the --set-upstream.
I've got it on my todo list to make --set-upstream take <new_upstream> as its argument so that you can just say:
$ git branch --set-upstream <new_upstream>
j.