Re: Do not let lstree output recursively when a directory whose name is a prefix of the others is given in the path list.

From: Davi Reis <davi.reis@gmail.com>
Date: Sep 9, 2010, 18:26 UTC
Message-ID: <AANLkTikZ11-3QhOxoW096cdA4LryuZQiegg=GLMO0BJB@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <vpqzkvr5u73.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>

I added the test and used git-sendemail again, but I guess it ended up in a different thread. Is this good enough or is there some formal path that I should take? Any help appreciated.

On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:

Show 20 quoted lines

> davi.reis@gmail.com writes:
>
>> Here is how to reproduce the bug:
>>
>> git init
>> mkdir prefix && touch prefix/a && git add prefix/a
>> mkdir prefixdir && touch prefixdir/b && git add prefixdir/b
>> git commit -a -m "If -r is not given, ls-tree should not show files in subdirs."
>> git ls-tree --name-only HEAD prefix  # works as expected
>> git ls-tree --name-only HEAD prefixdir  # works as expected
>> git ls-tree --name-only HEAD prefix prefixdir  # shows file, not dir
>
> That's so close to a real test-case... You should incorporate this in
> your patch (e.g. in t/t3101-ls-tree-dirname.sh), to make sure such bug
> never happens again.
>
> --
> Matthieu Moy
> http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
>

-- 
[]s
Davi de Castro Reis