Re: [PATCHv4 1/4] commit: --fixup option for use with rebase --autosquash
- From
Pat Notz <patnotz@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 23, 2010, 18:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTikUonhDU-_mq+ON2nRvHEnJszR5jW7siyeXDFLn@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vsk10qr7p.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 25 quoted lines
> "Pat Notz" <patnotz@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> + } else if (fixup_message) {
>> + unsigned char sha1[20];
>> + struct commit *commit;
>> + struct pretty_print_context ctx = {0};
>> + if (get_sha1(fixup_message, sha1))
>> + die("could not lookup commit %s", fixup_message);
>> + commit = lookup_commit_reference(sha1);
>> + if (!commit || parse_commit(commit))
>> + die("could not parse commit %s", fixup_message);
>> + format_commit_message(commit, "fixup! %s\n\n", &sb, &ctx);
>> + hook_arg1 = "message";
>
>
> I notice that the above is a half-copy-and-paste from "if (use_message)"
> codepath that handles -c/-C. A few issues to think about (i.e. not
> complaints; I haven't thought about them myself):
>
> (1) Is it worth refactoring the original instead of copying;
>
> (2) What happens/should happen when the original commit is encoded
> differently from the current commit encoding? -c/-C codepath takes
> pains to re-encode. Should we do so somewhere in this codepath, too?
>Yes, this was the concern I expressed in the v1 series patch. I'm getting more comfortable with the code so I'll look into re-encoding appropriately.
Show 14 quoted lines
> (3) If the answer to (2) is "Yes", notice that format_commit_message()
> does not re-encode the commit log message ("log" output codepath uses
> pretty.c::pretty_print_commit(), which reencodes for log output
> encoding). Maybe we need an option to tell format_commit_message()
> to do so?
>
> The last is not exactly an issue this patch alone should address, but I
> thought I'd better mention it anyway.
>
> My knee-jerk answers to the above are:
>
> (1) The first handful of lines in this new "if (fixup_message)" codeblock
> up to "die" might want to use a helper function shared with the
> existing "if (use_message)" codepath;Agreed. I'll factor out the duplication.
> > (2) We probably want to re-encode to the log output encoding the string > we receive from format_commit_message() in this codepath.
Will do.
> > (3) No need yet. >