Show 30 quoted lines
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:03:36AM +0200, Bert Wesarg wrote:
>> ---
>> README | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/README b/README
>> index 5ca0424..348f515 100644
>> --- a/README
>> +++ b/README
>> @@ -520,10 +520,15 @@ tg log
>> ~~~~~~
>> Prints the git log of the named topgit branch.
>>
>> - Note: if you have shared the TopGit branch, this command
>> - only lists the commits that were made in the current
>> - repository, so you will not see work done by your
>> - collaborators.
>> + Note: that you don't see changes made by the remote
>> + when the topic diverged at both sides. Any 'fast-forward'
>> + updates from remote topics will shown up. This could also
>> + mean, that you 'lose' all your history, because the remote
>> + made the merge and you do only a 'fast-forward'. Than you
>> + will see only his history from now on. So its best to prevent
>> + diverging development if you like to 'preserve' the full
>> + history. Please note, that 'lose' and 'preserve' only relates
>> + to when showing the log.
> Hmm, I see your intention, but I wonder if it wouldn't be enough to say:
>
> Note: if you have merged changes from a different repository, this
> command might not list all interesting commits.
Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>