RE: [PATCH] git-rev-parse.txt: Add more examples for caret and colon
- From
Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
- Date
- Jun 28, 2010, 10:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <A612847CFE53224C91B23E3A5B48BAC74483CEF65C@xmail3.se.axis.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <97667b60355ab334a390985cae56a28f7a622eb3.1277712897.git.git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Show 38 quoted lines
> -----Original Message-----
> From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:git-owner@vger.kernel.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael J Gruber
> Sent: den 28 juni 2010 10:18
> To: git@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Junio C Hamano; Matthieu Moy
> Subject: [PATCH] git-rev-parse.txt: Add more examples for caret and
> colon
>
> Several items in the caret, colon and friends section contain examples
> already. Make sure they all come with examples, and that examples come
> early so that they serve as a visual guide, as well.
>
> Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
> ---
> This is on top of the ":path" patch to git-rev-parse.txt.
>
> I chose not to rewrap the paragraphs so that the diff is clearer,
> especially with --color-words.
> I don't know what the best patch workflow guideline is here. Maybe
> rewrapping a v2?
>
> Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt b/Documentation/git-rev-
> parse.txt
> index d525e57..da5cdf4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt
> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ the `$GIT_DIR/refs` directory or from the
> `$GIT_DIR/packed-refs` file.
> the branch the ref is set to build on top of. Missing ref defaults
> to the current branch.
>
> -* A suffix '{caret}' to a revision parameter means the first parent of
> +* A suffix '{caret}' to a revision parameter (e.g. "HEAD^") means the first parent ofShouldn't that be
* A suffix '{caret}' to a revision parameter (e.g. `HEAD{caret}`) means the first parent offor consistency?
Show 9 quoted lines
> that commit object. '{caret}<n>' means the <n>th parent (i.e.
> 'rev{caret}'
> is equivalent to 'rev{caret}1'). As a special rule,
> @@ -282,23 +282,24 @@ the `$GIT_DIR/refs` directory or from the `$GIT_DIR/packed-refs` file.
> and dereference the tag recursively until a non-tag object is
> found.
>
> -* A colon, followed by a slash, followed by a text: this names
> +* A colon, followed by a slash, followed by a text (e.g. ":/fix nasty bug"): this namesMost examples in this file seem to use `` rather than "".
Show 27 quoted lines
> a commit whose commit message starts with the specified text. > This name returns the youngest matching commit which is > reachable from any ref. If the commit message starts with a > '!', you have to repeat that; the special sequence ':/!', > followed by something else than '!' is reserved for now. > > -* A suffix ':' followed by a path; this names the blob or tree > +* A suffix ':' followed by a path (e.g. "HEAD:README"); this names the blob or tree > at the given path in the tree-ish object named by the part > - before the colon. ":path" (with an empty part before the colon) > + before the colon. > + ":path" (with an empty part before the colon, e.g. ":README") > is a special case of the syntax described next: content > recorded in the index at the given path. > > * A colon, optionally followed by a stage number (0 to 3) and a > - colon, followed by a path; this names a blob object in the > - index at the given path. Missing stage number (and the colon > - that follows it) names a stage 0 entry. During a merge, stage > + colon, followed by a path (e.g. ":0:README"); this names a blob object in the > + index at the given path. Missing stage number (and the colon > + that follows it, e.g. ":README") names a stage 0 entry. During a merge, stage > 1 is the common ancestor, stage 2 is the target branch's version > (typically the current branch), and stage 3 is the version from > the branch being merged. > -- > 1.7.1.621.g01d76
I tried to find a document describing documentation standards for git (i.e., something similar to Documentation/CodingGuidelines), but could not find any such document. Did I just miss it, or does it not exist?
//Peter