Re: cvs import
- From
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 13, 2006, 21:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <9e4733910609131438n686b6d72u4d5799533c7473d7@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <450872AE.5050409@bluegap.ch>
On 9/13/06, Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Martin Langhoff wrote: > > On 9/14/06, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Let's copy the git list too and maybe we can come up with one importer > >> for everyone. > > > > It's a really good idea. cvsps has been for a while a (limited, buggy) > > attempt at that. > > BTW: good point, I always thought about cvsps. Does anybody know what > 'dump' format that uses?
cvsps has potential but the multiple missing branch labels in the Mozilla CVS confuse it and its throws away important data. It's algorithm would need reworking too. cvs2svn is the only CVS converter that imported Mozilla CVS on the first try and mostly got things right.
Patchset format for cvsps http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/README
AFAIK none of the CVS converters are using the dependency algorithm. So the proposal on the table is to develop a new converter that uses the dependency data from CVS to form the change sets and then outputs this data in a form that all of the backends can consume. Of course each of the backends is going to have to write some code in order to consume this new import format.
Show 8 quoted lines
> > For sure it's algorithm isn't that strong. cvs2svn is better, IMHO. The > proposed dependency resolving algorithm will be even better /me thinks. > > Regards > > Markus >
-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com