Re: why still no empty directory support in git
- From
- demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 30, 2008, 08:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <9b18b3110812300043l55a42f6sd995f36bf857543e@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.2.00.0812300113050.22107@vellum.laroia.net>
2008/12/30 Asheesh Laroia <asheesh@asheesh.org>:
Show 26 quoted lines
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > >> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Ping Yin wrote: >> >>> 2. unclear logic, for example, whether to remove the directory after the >>> last file in it is deleted >> >> This is the thing I dislike most about git: that it sometimes calls >> rmdir() for me. At least, one should be able to turn it off in a >> per-repository basis. I'm going to see how hard a patch that would be to >> write. > > Well, changing this behavior seems to be "as easy as" changing unlink_entry > in unpack_trees.c to not always rmdir(). The most naive thing I can think of > is to have unlink_entry in unpack_trees check against the git config. It's > probably more sensible for unpack_trees to be passed an argument that > determines if it rmdir()s; that argument could be set via argv at "git > unpack-tree" time, which could be set out of a configuration value read at > "git" time. > > Would a change of the "more sensible" kind possibly be accepted by the git > maintainer? > > I ask about this because I'm using git to track email in Maildir > repositories, and in that vein I'm getting bitten by git's removal of empty > directories.
Add a .exists to each directory. There is precedent for such an approach in other systems.
cheers, Yves
-- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"