Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT preformatted documentation available.
- From
- Adrien Beau <adrienbeau@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 28, 2005, 16:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <94fc236b0512280851n797ecbedjecae3f8131b84369@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vu0cuc4c2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On 12/27/05, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> > I was asked to provide pre-formatted man pages (and perhaps html > pages), since the time of kernel developers are better spent on > what they do best, rather than preparing the xmlto toolchain. > > I was planning to do a tarball every time I do a "release", but > that would mean it is no better than the current way --- you > could extract manpages out of rpm anyway. > > So instead, I'll do independent branches "html" and "man" in > git.git repository to keep the preformatted documentation.
Having preformatted documentation is a great step forward, but it would be even better if we could have it without installing some weird RPM tool or a local copy of the Git repository -- not all my machines have that.
Besides, it's not very beginner- or newcomer-friendly. Grab the source; discover you need a complex toolchain to have manpages; maybe learn sometime later that "all you had to do" was get an RPM and explode some parts of it -- nah, it just doesn't feel right.
You're already generating five RPMs and two tarballs everytime you release a version, would it be much more taxing to generate a third tarball?
That said, those two new branches are neat. Thanks!