git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [RFC] Git User's Survey 2009 - second trial run, and question about announcing it

From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date
Jul 6, 2009, 12:31 UTC
Message-ID
<94a0d4530907060531n264d416u615f6924969dd277@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<4A51B25C.9040904@op5.se>
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Andreas Ericsson<ae@op5.se> wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Jakub Narebski<jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's just that somehow for "Git Development Community" a mailing list
>>> is enough.  We don't have official git blog, we don't have bugtracker
>>> (issue tracker).  At the beginning git didn't even had _homepage_.
>>
>> How do you know that? Have you already asked that question in a survey
>> already? ;)
>>
>
> The git developer community flourishes without official blogs, and it
> did so even before we had a webpage. In truth, I visit the mailing
> list archives more often than I visit the webpage. It doesn't *need* a
> blog (or a forum, or a tracker, or whatever), but some people might
> find such things helpful. Personally, I'm a huge fan of having it all
> in one place.
I'm not saying a blog is needed for git to flourish.
I'm saying a blog would help to send official messages.
Show 17 quoted lines
>> As an experiment I added http://gitrss.q42.co.uk/announce.rss to my
>> Google Reader, and through some tricks you can actually see how many
>> people are subscribed to that feed: 26. For reference
>> gitlog.wordpress.com has 28, and Planet IM, a relatively unknown
>> planet: 844.
>>
>> And I have many friends who don't follow git's mailing list, so no, I
>> don't think a mailing list is enough for official announcements.
>>
>
> There are no forums suitable for everyone who are interested in git
> development. We can (sort of) rely on package maintainers for the
> various distros to keep track of groundbreaking changes. People who
> compile from source are sort of on their own if they don't want to
> follow the mailing list or in some other way find out what's going
> on. I don't have a problem with that, and it matches what I'd have
> expected myself if I was building something from source.

I'm not talking about people that compile git, I'm talking about the bulk of the users; the ones who use package management to install git and most of the time don't even know which version they are running nor what new features are available.

In any case, you think there's no need for a blog, I think there is, how about the rest of the users? Isn't that a question suitable for asking in the survey?

-- 
Felipe Contreras
Previous: Jakub NarebskiNext: Andreas Ericsson
Message 18 of 23 in “[RFC] Git User's Survey 2009 - second trial run, and question about announcing it”
  1. Jakub NarebskiJul 2, 2009
  2. Junio C HamanoJul 3, 2009
  3. Jakub NarebskiJul 3, 2009
  4. Felipe ContrerasJul 3, 2009
  5. David AguilarJul 4, 2009
  6. Felipe ContrerasJul 4, 2009
  7. Jakub NarebskiJul 4, 2009
  8. Felipe ContrerasJul 4, 2009
  9. Jakub NarebskiJul 4, 2009
  10. Felipe ContrerasJul 4, 2009
  11. Jakub NarebskiJul 5, 2009
  12. Junio C HamanoJul 5, 2009
  13. Felipe ContrerasJul 5, 2009
  14. Jakub NarebskiJul 5, 2009
  15. Felipe ContrerasJul 5, 2009
  16. Andreas EricssonJul 6, 2009
  17. Jakub NarebskiJul 6, 2009
  18. Felipe ContrerasJul 6, 2009
  19. Andreas EricssonJul 6, 2009
  20. Elijah NewrenJul 6, 2009
  21. Martin RenoldJul 4, 2009
  22. Jakub NarebskiJul 6, 2009
  23. Jakub NarebskiJul 8, 2009

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.