git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [RFC] Git User's Survey 2009 - trial run

From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date
Jun 26, 2009, 19:05 UTC
Message-ID
<94a0d4530906261205o6e4195dub4e38e8dccbd9258@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<200906261744.04610.jnareb@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Jakub Narebski<jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> On Fri, 26 June 2009, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> 2009/6/25 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
>
>> > I have created _proposed_ version of questions for upcoming
>> > "Git User's Survey 2009", based on (a bit of) feedback on git
>> > mailing list:
>> >  "[RFH] Questions for Git User's Survey 2009"
>> >  Msg-Id: <200905291855.03328.jnareb@gmail.com>
>> >  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/120287
>> > and comments on #git IRC channel on FreeNode.
>> >
>> > Current version of survey has 30 questions, as compared to
>> > 60 questions last year; the number of free-form essay questions
>> > were also greatly reduced.
>> >
>> >
>> > The *test* version of this year survey can be now found at
>> > the following URL (as in previous year, we use Survs.com)
>> >
>> >  http://www.survs.com/survey?id=2PIMZGU0&channel=TFN2Y52K7Y
<snip/>
>  +8. How did/do you obtain Git?
>
> It is IMHO more interesting how people upgrade Git, than just how
> they installed it.
Sure, but it can be assumed from how it was installed:
 * Some kind of package management (automatically updated)
 * In other binary form (manually)
 * From a source tarball (manually)
 * From git.git repository (manually)
<snip/>
Show 16 quoted lines
>> Also, I would like to see a list of areas users would like improvements:
>> XX. In you opinion, which areas need improvement?
>>  * user-interface
>>  * documentation
>>  * performance
>>  * more features
>>  * other
>>
>> Is there a way for users to assign points? eg. user-interface: 2,
>> documentation: 1, more features: 1
>
> We can always use 'matrix' form, with columns corresponding to importance
> of a given area for improvement (1-3, or 1-5 numeric range).  Because
> asking user to order from most important to least important (one can
> enforce this on Survs.com by requiring only one answer with given column
> selected) would be too difficult and confusing.
I see, in that case I think a matrix form would do.
Cheers.
-- 
Felipe Contreras
Previous: Jakub NarebskiNext: Jakub Narebski
Message 12 of 14 in “[RFC] Git User's Survey 2009 - trial run”
  1. Jakub NarebskiJun 25, 2009
  2. Johan HerlandJun 26, 2009
  3. Santi BéjarJun 26, 2009
  4. Felipe ContrerasJun 26, 2009
  5. Jakub NarebskiJun 26, 2009
  6. Johan HerlandJun 26, 2009
  7. Jakub NarebskiJun 28, 2009
  8. Peter BaumannJun 26, 2009
  9. Jakub NarebskiJun 26, 2009
  10. Felipe ContrerasJun 26, 2009
  11. Jakub NarebskiJun 26, 2009
  12. Felipe ContrerasJun 26, 2009
  13. Jakub NarebskiJun 29, 2009
  14. Jakub NarebskiJun 26, 2009

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.