git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

RE: [PATCH v3] apply: --intent-to-add should imply --index

From
JCJason Cho <jason11choca@proton.me>
Date
May 1, 2025, 09:03 UTC
Message-ID
<93yuUC_Wn9lQIDzJuvAWbCQ35kz1YxeNhsLLX67x9VzoPtRugVLNaHC_p1sWBzMxWy_VVRRl8av3Dx5PHw4_Cch0gmWs40DDrZRaezLVkGk=@proton.me>

I'm following up on the bug reported by Ryan Hodges on October 26, 2021, regarding the `git apply --intent-to-add` command incorrectly marking all other tracked files as deleted from the index.

Johannes Altmanninger submitted patch v3 titled "apply: --intent-to-add should imply --index" to fix this issue. 

Is this fix merged? If so, which Git version includes this fix.
Next: Kristoffer Haugsbakk
Message 1 of 14 in “RE: [PATCH v3] apply: --intent-to-add should imply --index”
  1. Jason ChoMay 1, 2025
  2. Kristoffer HaugsbakkMay 1, 2025
  3. Junio C HamanoMay 1, 2025
  4. Ryan HodgesMay 2, 2025
  5. Raymond E. PascoMay 3, 2025
  6. Raymond E. PascoMay 3, 2025
  7. 0/5 apply: fix apply --intent-to-addRaymond E. Pasco, May 11, 2025
  8. 1/5 apply: error on --intent-to-add outside gitdirRaymond E. Pasco, May 11, 2025
  9. 2/5 apply: read in the index in --intent-to-add modeRaymond E. Pasco, May 11, 2025
  10. Raymond E. PascoMay 12, 2025
  11. Jason ChoMay 13, 2025
  12. 3/5 apply: only write intents to add for new filesRaymond E. Pasco, May 11, 2025
  13. 4/5 t4140: test apply --intent-to-add interactionsRaymond E. Pasco, May 11, 2025
  14. 5/5 apply docs: clarify wording for --intent-to-addRaymond E. Pasco, May 11, 2025

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.