Re: tags and patches

From: Geoff Russell <geoffrey.russell@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 13, 2007, 12:04 UTC
Message-ID: <93c3eada0706130504g7f405b8ercd093b585b364eb5@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070613110401.GG21684@artemis.intersec.eu>

On 6/13/07, Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> wrote:

Show 31 quoted lines

> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:22:23PM +0930, Geoff Russell wrote:
> > Dear gits,
> >
> > (I'm on 1.5.0.5)
> >
> > The last tag made seems to be missing from a patch ... eg.
> >
> >        cd ~ ; mkdir myrepo ; cd myrepo
> >        git init-db ; echo STUFF > xxx ; git add xxx
> >        # work, work, work on xxx
> >        git commit -a
> >        git tag v1.0
> >        # work work work on xxx
> >        # then I clone this repository
> >        cd /tmp ; git clone ~/myrepo newmyrepo
> >        # go back and work some more
> >        cd ~/myrepo
> >        echo YYY >>xxx
> >        git commit -a
> >        git tag v1.1
> >        # is git commit -a required to commit the tag???
> >        git format-patch v1.0
> >        cd /tmp/newmyrepo
> >        git am ~/myrepo/THEPATCHNAME
> >        git tag ls
>
>   git tag ls is not the proper way to list tags. Afaict there isn't any
> yet, except: ls .git/refs/tags/
>
>   git tag ls just tagged your HEAD with the name 'ls' which is obviously
> not what you meant :)

Ooops. Yes, I meant "git tag -l" as the last command, which lists the tags, but doesn't list v1.1.

Geoff.

Show 7 quoted lines

>
> --
> ·O·  Pierre Habouzit
> ··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
> OOO                                                http://www.madism.org
>
>