Re: no --dry-run to git-pull ?
- From
- Neshama Parhoti <pneshama@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 4, 2008, 15:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <912ec82a0807040826v64afcc55i646d9c73b6fa8cd0@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080704135944.GA4729@genesis.frugalware.org>
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:56:27PM +0300, Neshama Parhoti <pneshama@gmail.com> wrote: >> Isn't there a way to do a --dry-run with git-pull ? > > Not really. But you can do a 'git fetch origin', then a > 'git log master..origin/master', and it'll tell you what changes will be > merged if you do a 'git merge origin/master'. > > NOTES: > > 1) Replace origin and master with your repomte and branch. > > 2) If this sounds cryptic for you, then it might be an important info > that by default a pull is a fetch + a merge.
What puzzles me is the origin keyword. Is it set only if I initially cloned a repo ? Because in my case, I have just rsync'ed a repo to another station, so I fear it will have no meaning in my case. Thank you
>