Re: [PATCH 2/3] merge-recursive: remove return value from get_files_dirs
- From
Ben Peart <peartben@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 28, 2017, 22:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8f1a7139-6f5b-eb47-ecb6-ded1d550b06a@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170828202829.3056-3-kewillf@microsoft.com>
On 8/28/2017 4:28 PM, Kevin Willford wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> The return value of the get_files_dirs call is never being used. > Looking at the history of the file and it was originally only > being used for debug output statements. Also when > read_tree_recursive return value is non zero it is changed to > zero. This leads me to believe that it doesn't matter if > read_tree_recursive gets an error. > > Since the debug output has been removed and the caller isn't > checking the return value there is no reason to keep calulating > and returning a value. >
Did a quick search and you're right, nothing is using the return value. No reason to spend time calculating it. Looks good.
Show 28 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Willford <kewillf@microsoft.com>
> ---
> merge-recursive.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
> index 033d7cd406..d47f40ea81 100644
> --- a/merge-recursive.c
> +++ b/merge-recursive.c
> @@ -328,15 +328,11 @@ static int save_files_dirs(const unsigned char *sha1,
> return (S_ISDIR(mode) ? READ_TREE_RECURSIVE : 0);
> }
>
> -static int get_files_dirs(struct merge_options *o, struct tree *tree)
> +static void get_files_dirs(struct merge_options *o, struct tree *tree)
> {
> - int n;
> struct pathspec match_all;
> memset(&match_all, 0, sizeof(match_all));
> - if (read_tree_recursive(tree, "", 0, 0, &match_all, save_files_dirs, o))
> - return 0;
> - n = o->current_file_set.nr + o->current_directory_set.nr;
> - return n;
> + read_tree_recursive(tree, "", 0, 0, &match_all, save_files_dirs, o);
> }
>
> /*
>