git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: is there an easier way to do this ?

From
Jacob Helwig <jacob.helwig@gmail.com>
Date
Dec 30, 2008, 04:00 UTC
Message-ID
<8c9a060812292000k18ccd466g628ea4161bac188b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<gjc5t2$g02$4@ger.gmane.org>
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 19:51, Zorba <cr@altmore.co.uk> wrote:
Show 75 quoted lines
> The manual shows you can SHOW untracked files, but not add them as part of
> the commit -a jig
>
> Seems a bit strange that git-add operates on both exisging and new files
> when used standalone, but its behaviour changes when encapsulated in
> commit -a...
>
> So, I thought maybe $ git commit -a, then $ git add .
> but then the files tracked have missed the commit boat they were meant to be
> on, haven't they,
>
> hang on -
> what about
>
> $ git add .
> $ git commit -a
>
> I do believe I've cracked it
> if so, it seems a bit wasteful, 2x adds (one explicti and one embedded
> in -a) ? shame on you linux kernel guys, i'd have expected better :-)
>
> "Zorba" <cr@altmore.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:gjc52u$ehc$4@ger.gmane.org...
>> ok, now I'm in this for real, archiving versions of our website project
>> (5k files approx)
>>
>> so here is the workflow:
>>
>> - copy version 1 files into GIT dir
>>
>> - open git bash
>>
>> $ git init
>>
>> $ git add .
>>
>> $ git commit -m "version1"
>>
>> all vanilla ? cool
>> next job = store version 2, so delete version 1 files from GIT dir, copy
>> in version 2
>> version2 has different files from 1 - which ones? Out of 5k files could be
>> 1% = 50 new ones, and same amount removed. Why should I care, with such a
>> powerful friend as git around, n'est pas?
>> THIS TIME we are going to be CLEVER and use "-a" flag on commit to pick up
>> any files that have been REMOVED (or "deleted" in git-speak)
>>
>> $ git commit -a -m "version2"
>>
>> BUT this does not pick up any new ones that have been added,
>>
>> and when we run
>>
>> $ git status > ../git_status.txt
>>
>> these are referred to as "untracked files"
>> only problem there are 50 ish
>> is there not another flag on git commit to treat any untracked file as a
>> new file ?
>> (would save me typing or creating a list out of these untracked ones and
>> feeding them into git add)
>>
>> I know, I realise now I should have looked up git-commit in the manual -
>> in case its not there, pls enlighten me !
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

If you do an explicit git add, then you don't need the -a on git commit, since everything you want to commit will already be in the index for git commit to work with.

Previous: ZorbaNext: Jeff Whiteside
Message 4 of 8 in “is there an easier way to do this ?”
  1. ZorbaDec 30, 2008
  2. Jacob HelwigDec 30, 2008
  3. ZorbaDec 30, 2008
  4. Jacob HelwigDec 30, 2008
  5. Jeff WhitesideDec 30, 2008
  6. Jakub NarebskiDec 30, 2008
  7. ZorbaDec 30, 2008
  8. Johannes SchindelinJan 1, 2009

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.