Re: git-svn and local only topic branch
- From
Guilhem Bonnefille <guilhem.bonnefille@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 3, 2007, 11:24 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8b65902a0705030424o4bd63435h143ba36ca5166902@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4638E127.4010303@midwinter.com>
On 5/2/07, Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> In his reply to my script, Junio correctly pointed out that all this > fiddling really ought to be happening in git-svn itself; it ought to > know that you've done a merge and should record that fact directly in > the metadata for 4' rather than treating it as a single-parent commit. > If you do the above a zillion times you'll end up with a huge grafts > file which is not so clean. But as a stopgap measure, this does work > adequately.
Yes, it's seems just fine. Thanks for the tips.
I'm not aware with the internal Git's features. As grafts seems to be a quick hack, is it posible to imagine that, after git-svn rewrited 4 in 4', an other tool rewrites (completly) the commit to produce a 4" with 2 parents?
-- Guilhem BONNEFILLE -=- #UIN: 15146515 JID: guyou@im.apinc.org MSN: guilhem_bonnefille@hotmail.com -=- mailto:guilhem.bonnefille@gmail.com -=- http://nathguil.free.fr/